Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Over the past decade, classifications using immune cell infiltration have been applied to many types of tumors; however, mesotheliomas have been less frequently evaluated. Methods: In this study, 60 well-characterized pleural mesotheliomas (PMs) were evaluated immunohistochemically for the characteristics of immune cells within tumor microenvironment (TME) using 10 immunohistochemical markers: CD3, CD4, CD8, CD56, CD68, CD163, FOXP3, CD27, PD-1, and TIM-3. For further characterization of PMs, hierarchical clustering analyses using these 10 markers were performed. Results: Among the immune cell markers, CD3 (p < 0.0001), CD4 (p = 0.0016), CD8 (p = 0.00094), CD163+ (p = 0.042), and FOXP3+ (p = 0.025) were significantly associated with an unfavorable clinical outcome. Immune checkpoint receptor expressions on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes such as PD-1 (p = 0.050), CD27 (p = 0.014), and TIM-3 (p = 0.0098) were also associated with unfavorable survival. Hierarchical clustering analyses identified three groups showing specific characteristics and significant associations with patient survival (p = 0.016): the highest number of immune cells (ICHigh); the lowest number of immune cells, especially CD8+ and CD163+ cells (ICLow); and intermediate number of immune cells (ICInt). ICHigh tumors showed significantly higher expression of PD-L1 (p = 0.00038). Cox proportional hazard model identified ICHigh [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.90] and ICInt (HR = 2.97) as potential risk factors compared with ICLow. Tumor CD47 (HR = 2.36), tumor CD70 (HR = 3.04), and tumor PD-L1 (HR = 3.21) expressions were also identified as potential risk factors for PM patients. Conclusion: Our findings indicate immune checkpoint and/or immune cell-targeting therapies against CD70-CD27 and/or CD47-SIRPA axes may be applied for PM patients in combination with PD-L1-PD-1 targeting therapies in accordance with their tumor immune microenvironment characteristics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Inaguma et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: