Background and Aims Therapeutic drug monitoring is used to optimize anti-tumour necrosis factor biologic effectiveness in inflammatory bowel disease, but its role with other biological classes is unclear. This study explores relationships between post-induction vedolizumab trough concentrations and biochemical outcomes in a real-world study of individuals with inflammatory bowel disease. Methods This retrospective analysis of data from a national patient support program between 2018 and 2020, included 436 individuals with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis receiving vedolizumab. Optimal vedolizumab concentration thresholds (at weeks 6 and 14) were determined based on their ability to predict biochemical normalization (week 30 faecal calprotectin [<250 µg/g], C-reactive protein [<5 mg/l]). Thresholds best associated with each outcome were evaluated in multivariate analyses. Results Among patients with Crohn’s disease, week 6 serum vedolizumab concentrations (>41.65 µg/ml) predicted normalization defined by C-reactive protein: Spearman correlation coefficient [ρ] = −0.26, P = 0.002 and multivariate analysis (MVA)—OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.32–7.87, P = 0.01, and at week 14 (>22.25 µg/ml): ρ = −0.38, P < 0.0001, and MVA—OR: 3.21, 95% CI: 1.26–8.17 but not faecal calprotectin. Similarly, among patients with ulcerative colitis, week 6 vedolizumab concentrations (>39.65 g/ml) predicted normalization defined by C-reactive protein: ρ = −0.26, P = 0.005 and MVA—OR: 4.03, 95% CI: 1.30–12.52, P = 0.016, and at week 14 (>17.35 µg/ml): ρ = −0.39, P = 0.0001 and MVA—OR: 6.95, 95% CI: 1.81–26.77, P = 0.005, but not faecal calprotectin. Conclusions Induction and post-induction serum vedolizumab were not consistently associated with biochemical normalization. As such, proactive therapeutic drug monitoring for vedolizumab should not be routinely incorporated in a treat to target strategy for inflammatory bowel disease. Clinical Trial Registration Number NCT04567628.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Seow et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: