The purpose is to examine and investigate the institution of appealing actions and decisions of government representatives from the perspective of subjective constitutional rights, as well as to establish organizational and legal forms of executive power through the prism of regional legislation and law enforcement practice in the subject of the Russian Federation. In this article, from the perspective of subjective constitutional rights, the institute of appealing against actions and decisions of government representatives is investigated. The authors focused on the formal legal content of constitutional norms that provide citizens with a set of guarantees in the exercise of the right to appeal against the actions and decisions of government representatives. Conclusion - this article highlights the problem that has developed in regional legislation and in law enforcement practice regarding the organizational and legal forms of the exercise of executive power. The use of various organizational and legal forms of regional executive power should not affect the mechanism of exercising the constitutional right to appeal against the actions and decisions of government representatives. In turn, this approach will ensure the dissemination of constitutional and procedural guarantees for citizens who appeal against actions and decisions of authorities and officials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
GIZYATOVA et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: