In this letter to the editor, the use of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, specifically the Chat-GPT based "Review Assistant" by Elsevier, for reviewing scientific articles is discussed. While the tool has many benefits such as detecting linguistic and typographical errors in manuscripts, it also has limitations. An example is highlighted where the AI gave an incorrect and potentially dangerous answer regarding the bond energies of molecules in an oral tumor. This mistake shows that the use of AI for scientific research evaluation can be a double-edged sword, as it may provide inaccurate information that could have serious consequences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marwan Al‐Raeei (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: