Some Issues Arising in Connection with the Selection of Personal Surety in Criminal Proceedings

The article is devoted to the consideration of problems arising in connection with the election of a preventive measure in the form of a personal guarantee in criminal proceedings. In this article, the author supports the position of scientists that what is the relationship between the guarantor and the assignee they have a specific character. The author, analyzing the provisions of the law, opinions of processualists, comes to the conclusion that that there is no requirement for the number of guarantors, in connection with what if several guarantors are involved in the case it is advisable to distribute responsibilities between them. The author comes to the conclusion that they can act as guarantors close people, close relatives of the suspect (accused), so do other people, which do not consist in the property, relationship to a person, to be brought to criminal responsibility, but they are trustworthy. The conclusion is justified, what qualities should be inherent in guarantors when choosing the specified preventive measure. The author considers, describes in detail the actions of the official when choosing a personal guarantee, obligations of the guarantor, and also sets out, what actions should the investigator (inquirer) take in case of refusal of the guarantor from his duties.