Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The role of numerical accuracy in training and evaluating neural network-based potential energy surfaces is examined for different experimental observables. For observables that require third- and fourth-order derivatives of the potential energy with respect to Cartesian coordinates single-precision arithmetics as is typically used in ML-based approaches is insufficient and leads to roughness of the underlying PES as is explicitly demonstrated. Increasing the numerical accuracy to double-precision gives a smooth PES with higher-order derivatives that are numerically stable and yield meaningful anharmonic frequencies and tunneling splitting as is demonstrated for H2CO and malonaldehyde. For molecular dynamics simulations, which only require first-order derivatives, single-precision arithmetics appears to be sufficient, though.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Käser et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: