This paper presents an overview and evaluation of some of the end-to-end ASR models on long-form audio.We study three categories of Automatic Speech Recognition(ASR) models based on their core architecture: (1) convolutional, (2) convolutional with squeeze-and-excitation, and (3) convolutional models with attention.We selected one ASR model from each category and evaluated the Word Error Rate, maximum audio length and real-time factor for each model on a variety of long audio benchmarks: Earnings-21 and 22, CORAAL, and TED-LIUM3.The model from the category of self-attention with local attention and global token has the best accuracy compared to other architectures.We also compared models with CTC and RNNT decoders and showed that CTC-based models are more robust and efficient than RNNT on long form audio.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koluguri et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: