Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recently, a design criterion depending on a lattice's volume and theta series, called the secrecy gain, was proposed to quantify the secrecy-goodness of the applied lattice code for the Gaussian wiretap channel. To address the secrecy gain of Construction A4 lattices from formally self-dual <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Z₄ </tex-math> -linear codes, i.e., codes for which the symmetrized weight enumerator (swe) coincides with the swe of its dual, we present new constructions of <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Z₄ </tex-math> -linear codes which are formally self-dual with respect to the swe. For even lengths, formally self-dual <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Z₄ </tex-math> -linear codes are constructed from nested binary codes and double circulant matrices. For odd lengths, a novel construction called odd extension from double circulant codes is proposed. Moreover, the concepts of Type I/II formally self-dual codes/unimodular lattices are introduced. Next, we derive the theta series of the formally unimodular lattices obtained by Construction A4 from formally self-dual <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Z₄ </tex-math> -linear codes and describe a universal approach to determine their secrecy gains. The secrecy gain of Construction A4 formally unimodular lattices obtained from formally self-dual <tex-math notation="LaTeX">Z₄ </tex-math> -linear codes is investigated, both for even and odd dimensions. Numerical evidence shows that for some parameters, Construction A4 lattices can achieve a higher secrecy gain than the best-known formally unimodular lattices from the literature. Results concerning the flatness factor, another security criterion widely considered in the Gaussian wiretap channel, are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bollauf et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: