Background: Age-related neuronal changes impact cognitive integrity, which is a major contributor to health and quality of life. The best strategy to prevent cognitive decline and Alzheimer’s disease is still debated. Objective: To investigate the long-term effects of the eight-week multicomponent training program BrainProtect ® on cognitive abilities compared to general health counseling (GHC) in cognitively healthy adults in Germany. Methods: Healthy adults (age ≥50 years) previously randomized to either GHC ( n = 72) or BrainProtect (intervention group, IG, n = 60) for eight-weeks (once weekly, 90 minutes, group-based) underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) evaluation 3- and 12-months after intervention end. Results: Dropout rates were n = 8 after 3 months and n = 19 after 12 months. No significant long-term effect of BrainProtect was observed for the primary endpoint Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease (CERAD-Plus) total score. Logical reasoning was significantly improved ( p = 0.024) 12 months after completion of the training program in IG participants compared to the GHC group independent of sex, age, education, diet, and physical activity. In IG participants, thinking flexibility ( p = 0.019) and confrontational naming ( p = 0.010) were improved 3 months after completing the intervention compared to the GHC group, however, after conservative Bonferroni adjustment, significance was lost. Conclusions: BrainProtect ® independently improved logical reasoning compared to GHC up to 12 months after cognitive training’s end in healthy adults. To uncover the long-term clinical significance of multicomponent cognitive training in healthy adults, studies with larger sample size and frequent follow up visits are necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunkler et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: