Ensuring the integrity and trustworthiness of science relies on reproducibility, a cornerstone of the scientific process.The availability of raw data in a FAIR manner (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) is a fundamental prerequisite for this pursuit (see https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/).In this note, we share our experience of obtaining the raw data and successfully reproducing the results published by Agarwal et al. [1] to both provide valuable information about a specific study and to illustrate the value and challenges of reproducibility and verification investigations.We reproduced and verified the results and conclusions published in Agarwal et al.'s paper [1].The process took us almost a year, with the direct involvement of 4 investigators, led by the senior investigators and biostatisticians in our team.There were also administrative tasks involved related to the data use
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jamshidi‐Naeini et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: