PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 14, 2024Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy2 citationsOpen Access

The impact of occlusive vs non-occlusive application of methyl aminolevulinate on the efficacy and tolerability of daylight photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis

View Full Paper
ITIlaria TraveISIlaria SalviFSFranco Aguirre Serazzi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Conventional photodynamic therapy (c-PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratoses (AKs) and nonmelanoma skin cancer which exploits the photosensitizing properties of methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL). Daylight photodynamic therapy (DL-PDT) is an alternative to c-PDT which does not require the application of MAL in occlusion and that is better tolerated by patients. The impact of occlusion on the efficacy of DL-PD has not been investigated by previous studies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Trave et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7410eb6db6435876ba40fhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2024.104049
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper