Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Depth-3 circuit lower bounds and k-SAT algorithms are intimately related; the state-of-the-art ᵏ₃-circuit lower bound and the k-SAT algorithm are based on the same combinatorial theorem. In this paper we define a problem which reveals new interactions between the two. Define Enum (k, t) problem as: given an n-variable k-CNF and an initial assignment, output all satisfying assignments at Hamming distance t from, assuming that there are no satisfying assignments of Hamming distance less than t from. Observe that: an upper bound b (n, k, t) on the complexity of Enum (k, t) implies: - Depth-3 circuits: Any ᵏ₃ circuit computing the Majority function has size at least nn{2}/b (n, k, n2). - k-SAT: There exists an algorithm solving k-SAT in time O (ₓ = ₁^n/2b (n, k, t) ). A simple construction shows that b (n, k, n2) 2^ (1 - O ( (k) /k) ) n. Thus, matching upper bounds would imply a ᵏ₃-circuit lower bound of 2^ ( (k) n/k) and a k-SAT upper bound of 2^ (1 - ( (k) /k) ) n. The former yields an unrestricted depth-3 lower bound of 2^ (n) solving a long standing open problem, and the latter breaks the Super Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. In this paper, we propose a randomized algorithm for Enum (k, t) and introduce new ideas to analyze it. We demonstrate the power of our ideas by considering the first non-trivial instance of the problem, i. e. , Enum (3, n2). We show that the expected running time of our algorithm is 1. 598ⁿ, substantially improving on the trivial bound of 3^n/2 1. 732ⁿ. This already improves ³₃ lower bounds for Majority function to 1. 251ⁿ. The previous bound was 1. 154ⁿ which follows from the work of Hstad, Jukna, and Pudl\'ak (Comput. Complex. '95).
Gurumukhani et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: