Objectives: To determine the inter-observer agreement between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans. Materials and Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional retrospective study was performed in a tertiary care hospital Karachi from 1st October 2021 to 31st march 2022. Total of 111 number of patients of 18-70 years of age of either gender who underwent emergency Head CT scans were included. Patients who came for follow-up CT scans were excluded. CT findings were interpreted by the radiology resident on duty. Subsequently, these CT images were interpreted by a consultant radiologist, and the decision of both resident and faculty member CT was correlated for inter-observer agreement. Results: The mean age was 47.47 ± 14.20 years. The majority of the patients 46 (41.44%) were between 56 to 70 years of age. Out of these 111 patients, 72 (64.86%) were male and 39 (35.14%) were female with a ratio of 1.9:1. Discrepancy between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans is seen in 6 (5.41%) patients. Inter-observer agreement between resident and consultant radiologists in reporting emergency head CT scans was found to be 94.59% with a kappa “κ” value of 0.885 which showed a very strong agreement. Conclusion: This study concluded that little discrepancy was found in inter-observer agreement between the radiology residents and the faculty members for interpretation of CT images of Head.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismail et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: