How strong is land-atmosphere coupling in global storm-resolving simulations?

The debate on the sign of land-atmosphere coupling has not been solved so far. On the one hand, studies using global coarse-resolution climate models have claimed that the land-atmosphere coupling is positive. But, such models use convective parameterizations, which is a source of uncertainty. On the other hand, studies using regional climate models with explicit convection have reported negative coupling. Yet, the large-scale circulation is prescribed in such models, and interactions with the ocean are neglected. In this study, we revisit the land-atmosphere coupling using a global fully coupled storm-resolving simulation that has been integrated at a grid spacing of 5 km over a full seasonal cycle, and we compare these results to a coarse-resolution climate model simulation using parameterized convection. We find that the coupling between soil moisture and precipitation is weaker and more negative in the storm-resolving than in the coarse-resolution simulation. Further analysis indicates that not only the feedback between soil moisture and evapotranspiration but also between evapotranspiration and precipitation is weaker in the storm-resolving simulation, in better agreement with observations. Reasons for the differences will be mentioned.