In recent years, an intriguing feature of back-propagating rupture (BPR) has been reported during some earthquakes (Ide et al., 2011; Houston et al., 2011; Hicks et al., 2020; Okuwaki et al., 2021; Vallée et al., 2023). The occurrence of BPR challenges the classical interpretation of rupture propagation as a “forward” problem, while remaining less understood by the earthquake science community. Here, using fracture mechanics, we first argue that BPR is nothing but an intrinsic component of rupture propagation; however, its observability is usually masked by the superposition effect of interfering waves behind the primary, forward-propagating rupture front. We then suggest that perturbation to an otherwise smooth rupture process can break the superposition effect and hence can make BPR observable. To test our idea, we report results of mode-II rupture propagation from both numerical simulations and laboratory observations. By introducing a variety of perturbations (lateral variation in bulk or interfacial properties along the fault, singular stress drop, coalescence of two rupture fronts, etc.) during rupture propagation, we show that prominent phases of BPR indeed can be successfully excited. We further classify BPR into two modes: higher-order rupture or interface wave, depending on whether the already-ruptured fault is quickly healed and whether additional stress drop can be produced. Lastly, we propose several application potentials for BPR, such as constraining the velocity structure of fault zones, probing the mechanical state of faults, and studying the stability of perturbed slip along a homogeneous or bimaterial interface. Our study refines the understanding of the nature and complexity of rupture process, and can help improve the assessment of earthquake hazards.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: