Theoretical model demonstrates that information salience reduces processing costs in asset pricing, suggesting enhanced price informativeness.
Recent studies confirm the main prediction of the rational inattention framework that the perceived value of information (top-down) as a key driver of attention. However, these investigations also report stimulus-driven salience effects (bottom-up) that counteract the framework's predictions. In this manuscript, I propose an extension to the standard rational inattention model by incorporating bottom-up attention processes such as salience-effects through varying information processing costs. Applied to asset pricing with a representative agent a higher information salience generally reduces the cost of information processing (attention) needed for the same level of uncertainty reduction. Due to a substitution effect in the attention allocation across information, an attention-maximizing salience emerges. In general, a higher information salience consistently enhances asset price informativeness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Steve Heinke (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: