By modifying the structures of targeted A2AR antagonists and tracers, novel compounds 3, 7a, 9, 12c, and BIBD-399 were designed and synthesized. In vitro inhibition experiments demonstrated that 3, 12c, and BIBD-399 have high affinity for A2AR. [18F]3 and [18F]BIBD-399 were successfully synthesized. In terms of biological distribution, the brain uptake of [18F]MNI-444 exhibits greater than that of [18F]3 and [18F]BIBD-399. PET imaging shows that [18F]3 is off-target in the brain, while [18F]BIBD-399 and [18F]MNI-444 can be specifically imaged in regions with high A2AR expression. Differently, [18F]BIBD-399 could quickly reach equilibrium in the targeted region within 10 min after administration, while [18F]MNI-444 shows a slowly increasing trend within 2 h of administration. [18F]BIBD-399 is mainly metabolized by the liver and kidney, and there is no obvious defluorination in vivo. Additional in vitro autoradiography showed that the striatal signals of [18F]BIBD-399 and [18F]MNI-444 were inhibited by the A2AR antagonist SCH442416 but not by the A1R antagonist DPCPX, demonstrating the high A2AR binding specificity of [18F]BIBD-399. Molecular docking further confirms the high affinity of MNI-444 and BIBD-399 for A2AR. Further tMCAo imaging showed that [18F]BIBD-399 can sensitively distinguish between infarcted and noninfarcted sides, a capability not observed with [18F]MNI-444. Given its pharmacokinetic properties and the ability to identify lesion regions, [18F]BIBD-399 has potential advantages in monitoring A2AR changes, meriting further clinical investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: