Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Wildfires are increasing across northern high latitudes. Besides the immediate carbon pool losses from directly disturbed areas, recent studies have reported high porewater nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) concentrations in burned areas and downstream waters for a few months to several years after fire occurrence. Increasing nutrient deposition and soil fertilizer use have been widely investigated for water quality and carbon loss in agricultural soils, but not for remote subarctic peatlands. In this study, we sampled soil cores (0-25 cm) from a bog and a fen peatland in the Scotty Creek watershed in the Northwest Territories and conducted an incubation experiment for the effects of added nutrients in porewater. Aliquots of the peatlands were divided into separate containers and artificial porewater was added, either amended with dissolved inorganic N (NH4 + NO3), P (PO4), both N and P, or unamended. The production rates of gaseous CO2, CH4 and N2O were measured at 1, 5, 15, and 25°C. We further analyzed the initial and final soil physical properties, porewater chemistry, and microbial biomass C:N:P ratios. The fen incubations yielded overall greater CO2 and CH4 production rates than the bog incubations, which we attributed to differences in soil properties and initial microbial biomass. The N addition to the bog samples increased CO2 production, while the P addition to the fen samples increased CO2 production. The addition of both N and P reduced CO2 production but elevated that of CH4 for both peatland soils. After a month, the pore water C, N, and P stochiometric ratios approached the initial soil microbial biomass ratios, suggesting microbial nutrient recycling in an inherently nutrient-poor soil environment. These preliminary results imply a complex response of carbon turnover in peatland soils to nutrient enrichment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Byun et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: