Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mass loss of snow packs due to recrystallization processes and subsequent vapor fluxes are inherently difficult to measure experimentally. Present numerical advances enable new simulation tools to explore the otherwise invisible mass fluxes due to diffusive and convective water vapor transport. In this study we calculate the effective vapor fluxes as a function of the local mass transfer coefficient, snow depth, and a range of microstructure parameters given by porosity and specific surface area. A set of flow, heat transport and vapor transport equations re developed. Heat transport is characterized by the Rayleigh number while vapor transport depends on the Péclet and Damkhöler numbers. The latter measures the relative importance of vapor transfer to advective fluxes. For low Rayleigh numbers, the system behaves in a purely diffusive manner. however, convective transport mechanisms dominate for high Rayleigh values. Convection is found to enhance vapor transport. This is in agreement with previously unexplained mass losses in field observations. The effect of vapor mass transfer between the solid and gas phase is also analyzed. The results can be used for macroscale snow pack models to predict large scale mass loss due to sublimation for snow covered areas such as Antarctica, Greenland and seasonally covered Tundra.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hidalgo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: