I focus on two of the challenges Pautz raises for representationalist theories of perception. The first is the challenge of explaining the necessity of certain principles which Pautz calls 'laws of appeaeance.' The second is based on the idea that the most promising versions of representationalism seem to lead to irrealism about the sensible qualities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeff Speaks (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: