PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2024Energy & Fuels6 citations

Fabrication of Novel Nanosulfur-Modified Activated Carbon Adsorbent for Elemental Mercury Removal from Flue Gas

View Full Paper
RSRuize SunJilin UniversityGLGuangqian LuoHuazhong University of Science and TechnologyMYMingyu YuHuazhong University of Science and Technology

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Mercury is a toxic heavy metal, with substantial risks to human health. In China, coal-fired power plants are the largest anthropogenic source of mercury emissions. Despite the high mercury removal performance of commercial chlorine- or bromine-modified activated carbon (AC), concerns have arisen regarding the leaching potential of mercury and halogen species in the product. This work proposed the synthesis of unique nanosulfur-modified AC as a mercury removal adsorbent, assisted with nonthermal plasma technology. Nanosulfur particles were successfully produced and characterized (morphology and size distribution) using high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. The H2S decomposition reaction acceleration mechanism in the plasma area under different H2S concentrations and the influence of the equivalent reduced field were assessed. Fixed-bed mercury adsorption experiments showed the superior performance of the nanosulfur-modified AC adsorbent, achieving a removal efficiency of 88.9%. The effects of adsorption temperature and simulated flue gas components on the nanosulfur-modified AC's performance were investigated. The optimal adsorption temperature was found to be 140 °C, suggesting that it is more suitable for coal-fired power plants without a low-temperature electrostatic precipitator system. Additionally, the simulated flue gas showed promotional effects on the adsorbent performance, resulting in an efficiency increase of 20.2%. In order to reveal the adsorbent mercury removal mechanism, the sulfur species and concentration of both fresh and spent adsorbents were determined through X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. In summary, this research proposed a novel fabrication method and deepened our understanding of the mercury–sulfur reaction mechanism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sun et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e7569cb6db6435876cea23https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c04460
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Synergistic Mercury Removal by Conventional Pollutant Control Strategies for Coal-Fired Power Plants in China2010 · 40 citations
  2. 2Self-template synthesis of hollow nano-spherical nickel silicate/nickel sulfide composite and its application for lithium-sulfur battery2021 · 21 citations
  3. 3Solving the Boltzmann equation to obtain electron transport coefficients and rate coefficients for fluid models2005 · 3,375 citations
  4. 4A Comprehensive Review on the Heavy Metal Toxicity and Sequestration in Plants2021 · 365 citations
  5. 5Synthesis and Characterization of Nano-Sulfur and Its Impact on Growth, Yield, and Quality of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)2022 · 22 citations