According to Peters et al. (2017), millions of students have already demonstrated they know the material slated to be taught that year. Consequently, grade-level standards are unlikely to be appropriately challenging for these students. In this paper, we conceptually replicate and extend this study. Using data from schools that administered the Renaissance Star assessment in fall 2018 and fall 2021, we quantify pre-COVID and mid-COVID average achievement and variance in achievement in mathematics and reading in fifth grade and estimate the grade level of instruction needed for students. Our results indicate that (a) achievement dropped during COVID-19 relative to pre-COVID, but the drop in mathematics was larger, and (b) achievement variability increased during COVID-19, but the variability in reading was slightly more pronounced. Further, our results replicated Peters et al.’s (2017) results—large numbers of students still performed above grade level, and substantial variability in achievement was present within schools.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rambo‐Hernandez et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: