⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

March 5, 2024Critical Care Medicine

Extracorporeal Versus Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study

Yuan Bian Yuhui Pan Jiaqi Zheng Wen Zheng Lijie Qin Guangju Zhou Xifeng Sun Mingjie Wang Chunyi Wang Yuguo Chen Feng Xu

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

Comparing the effects of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) and conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CCPR) on outcomes in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in China. The benefits of ECPR over CCPR in patients with IHCA remain controversial.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Bian et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e758cbb6db6435876d0a48 https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000006223

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Extracorporeal Versus Conventional Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestsRandomized Controlled Trial · 2026
2Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation vs. conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a pre-planned, trial-based economic evaluation2024 · 20 citations
3Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for patients with refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a propensity score matching, observational study2024 · 5 citations
4Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in- and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: The race against time2024 · 4 citations
5Risk factors and outcome of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and in-hospital cardiac arrest: a nationwide prospective and observational study of 939 hospitals in China2025 · 1 citations