PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 20243 citationsOpen Access

Understanding the Transit Gap: A Comparative Study of On-Demand Bus Services and Urban Climate Resilience in South End, Charlotte, NC and Avondale, Chattanooga, TN

View Full Paper
SHSanaz Sadat HosseiniUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteBABabak Rahimi ArdabiliUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteMAMona AzarbayjaniUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Urban design significantly impacts sustainability, particularly in the context of public transit efficiency and carbon emissions reduction. This study explores two neighborhoods with distinct urban designs: South End, Charlotte, NC, featuring a dynamic mixed-use urban design pattern, and Avondale, Chattanooga, TN, with a residential suburban grid layout. Using the TRANSIT-GYM tool, we assess the impact of increased bus utilization in these different urban settings on traffic and CO2 emissions. Our results highlight the critical role of urban design and planning in transit system efficiency. In South End, the mixed-use design led to more substantial emission reductions, indicating that urban layout can significantly influence public transit outcomes. Tailored strategies that consider the unique urban design elements are essential for climate resilience. Notably, doubling bus utilization decreased daily emissions by 10.18% in South End and 8.13% in Avondale, with a corresponding reduction in overall traffic. A target of 50% bus utilization saw emissions drop by 21.45% in South End and 14.50% in Avondale. At an idealistic goal of 70% bus utilization, South End and Avondale witnessed emission reductions of 37.22% and 27.80%, respectively. These insights are crucial for urban designers and policymakers in developing sustainable urban landscapes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hosseini et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e75a06b6db6435876d1183https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2403.14671
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Demographic Disparities, Service Efficiency, Safety, and User Satisfaction in Public Bus Transit System: A Survey-based Case Study in the City of Charlotte, NC2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2Residential energy and transport coupling for neighborhood decarbonization in transit-oriented development2026
  3. 3Built Environment Performance and User Perception of Urban Transit Interface: A Mixed-Methods Empirical Assessment of Bus Corridor in Udupi, India2026
  4. 4Data-Driven Modeling of Demand-Responsive Transit: Evaluating Sustainability Across Urban, Rural, and Intercity Scenarios2025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Assessing the Spatial Sustainability of Urban Bus Transit: A Socioeconomic Sustainability Perspective2025