Background and objective: Valid and cost-effective approaches are essential to assess physical activity and sedentary behaviors in individuals of all ages. This study aimed to validate a physical activity recall questionnaire (PAR-Q) and a physical activity log against the doubly labelled water (DLW) technique in 11-13-year-old Sri Lankan children. Method : Total energy expenditure (TEE) was determined using the criterion DLW technique (TEE DLW ) and physical activity energy expenditure (PAEE DLW ) was estimated. Subsequently, physical activity assessment methods were validated in a group of children (n=96). PAR-Q was adapted from the adolescent physical activity questionnaire and the physical activity log from the Bouchard activity diary. The youth physical activity compendium was used to calculate PAEE from both PAR-Q (PAEE PAR-Q ) and activity log (PAEE PALog ). Statistical analysis included Spearman’s correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analyses. Results: Mean age of the study sample was 12.0 ± 0.8 years where the greater proportion were males (51.9%, n=41). PAEE PAR-Q and PAEE PALog were significantly correlated with the PAEE DLW ( r =0.63 and r =0.49, p < 0.05). PAR-Q and activity log underestimated PAEE by 304.2 ± 1223.8 kJ/day and 375.3 ± 1087.4 kJ/day, respectively. Using Bland-Altman analysis, the majority of data points were within the limits of agreement in both PAR-Q and activity log. Conclusion: PAR-Q is a valid tool for predicting PAEE in Sri Lankan children whereas the physical activity log was not. Researchers and practitioners can confidently use the PAR-Q to assess physical activity in this population, with potential applications in various research and intervention settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hills et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: