Theoretical analysis demonstrates improved logarithmic regret bounds in linear contextual bandits, highlighting robust performance across stochastic and adversarial environments.
This study considers the linear contextual bandit problem with independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) contexts. In this problem, existing studies have proposed Best-of-Both-Worlds (BoBW) algorithms whose regrets satisfy O(log²(T)) for the number of rounds T in a stochastic regime with a suboptimality gap lower-bounded by a positive constant, while satisfying O(√T) in an adversarial regime. However, the dependency on T has room for improvement, and the suboptimality-gap assumption can be relaxed. For this issue, this study proposes an algorithm whose regret satisfies O(log(T)) in the setting when the suboptimality gap is lower-bounded. Furthermore, we introduce a margin condition, a milder assumption on the suboptimality gap. That condition characterizes the problem difficulty linked to the suboptimality gap using a parameter β ∈ (0, ∞]. We then show that the algorithm's regret satisfies O(log(T)\1+β/2+βT1/2+β). Here, β= ∞ corresponds to the case in the existing studies where a lower bound exists in the suboptimality gap, and our regret satisfies O(log(T)) in that case. Our proposed algorithm is based on the Follow-The-Regularized-Leader with the Tsallis entropy and referred to as the α-Linear-Contextual (LC)-Tsallis-INF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kato et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: