This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The concept of improvisation is revisited by means of a closer look at its role in the Mann Gulch wildland fire that claimed 13 lives. An improvised escape fire intended to create a safe area saved only one life. This suggests that the success of an improvisation depends on the relationship between wariness and understanding. That relationship, conceptualized as a "surface of apprehension," is shaped by at least four contingencies: one's raw experience, elements that are analyzed out of flux, the personal bearing of what is at hand, and the words selected to render this finitude sensible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karl E. Weick (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: