The overall survival (OS) improvement of immunochemotherapy in ES-SCLC is far from satisfactory. It is found that anlotinib (an anti-angiogenesis drug) could reprogram immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment and synergistic therapeutic benefits when combined with Immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or chemotherapy. ETER701 is the first randomized phase III trial evaluating anlotinib + etoposide/carboplatin (EC) ± benmelstobart (a novel developed PD-L1 inhibitor) vs placebo + EC in first-line ES-SCLC therapy. A historically longest OS was observed with anlotinib + EC + benmelstobart vs placebo + EC. Here we present the data of anlotinib + EC (anlotinib arm) vs placebo + EC (EC arm). In this multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study, eligible ES-SCLC patients were randomized (1:1:1) to receive benmelstobart + anlotinib + EC or placebo + anlotinib or placebo + EC for four 21-day cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with benmelstobart + anlotinib or placebo + anlotinib or placebo + EC. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by the independent review committee (IRC) and OS in the intention-to-treat population. 738 patients were enrolled between March 18, 2020 and December 18, 2021. 245 patients were assigned to anlotinib arm and 247 to EC arm. With a median follow-up of 14.0 months (data cut-off May 14, 2022), median PFS in anlotinib arm was significantly longer than in EC arm (5.6 months vs 4.2 months; HR, 0.44; 95%CI, 0.36 to 0.55; P<0.0001), median OS was 13.3 months in anlotinib arm and 11.9 months in EC arm (HR, 0.86; 95%CI, 0.67-11.10; P=0.1723). The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was 94.3% vs 87.0%, and 2.5% vs 1.6% were grade 5, respectively. Anlotinib plus chemotherapy showed a significant PFS improvement and a numerical OS benefit over chemotherapy in the first-line ES-SCLC therapy. The survival benefits of anti-angiogenesis plus chemotherapy is comparable to immunochemotherapy, and the safety profile is tolerable and manageable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: