Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Introduction 95%CI 1.02–2.54; p-value 0.040) and reported depression (OR 2.35; 95%CI 1.11–4.98; p-value 0.026). Social distancing had an additional financial impact on 32.3% of persons affected by leprosy in this study. Discussion & Conclusion The pandemic had significant economic, social, and health impacts on the lives of persons affected by leprosy, further complicating leprosy control efforts. Medication availability, medical and psychological patient follow-up, as well as contact screening, were hindered during the pandemic, making the control of leprosy even more challenging. Recognizing the weaknesses of the leprosy control program is crucial for enhancing services both presently and in preparation for future crises like pandemics. Brazil could enhance leprosy control services by implementing novel disease control strategies, including additional prevention measures for contacts. In addition to the necessary improvements needed at the clinical health system level, addressing social vulnerability and enhancing individual mental wellbeing are urgent priorities. This could be achieved through initiatives such as offering counseling and establishing peer-support groups.
Rocha et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: