Background: For the patient seeking correction, gingival hyperpigmentation may be a major concern, particularly in cases of vertical maxillary excess, high lip line, and strong aesthetic demand.Objective: to assess if ceramic soft tissue trimming bur equally efficient as a gingival depigmentation tool versus diode laser.Materials and Methods: A total of 30 patients who needed depigmentation procedures in upper jaw . In this study we used split mouth design by dividing the upper jaws into 2 equal half. In Group 1, The soft tissue trimming bur performed the depigmentation treatment. The depigmentation process in Group 2 was completed using a laser.Results: Group I showed a significant difference at follow-up visits (p<0.001). Value recorded at 1 month (100.00±0.00) had the greatest mean value then 7 days (82.43±8.42) while value recorded at baseline (0.00±0.00) showed the least mean value. Pairwise assessments showed significantly different values (p<0.001). Group II had a significant variation at follow-up then 7 days (82.94±8.02) while at baseline (0.00±0.00) showed the least mean value. Pairwise comparisons showed significantly different values at different intervals (p<0.001).Conclusion: The outcomes of the two methods of treatment were nearly identical. A Aesthetic satisfaction and equitable wound healing. Compared to diode lasers, soft tissue trimmers are less expensive and easier to operate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fouda et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: