This paper first expounds the current situation of the scope of damages for contracting negligence liability and explains the necessity of determining the scope of damages for contracting negligence liability from the perspective of unclear legal provisions, inconsistent court judgment and diversification of theories. The scope of compensation for damages in three types of disputes, whether trust interests should compensate for indirect interests, and whether the scope of compensation is limited to performance interests, are discussed one by one. The conclusion is that inherent interests should not be included in the scope of compensation for damages, indirect interests should be compensated, and the scope of compensation for contractual negligence should not be limited to performance interests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yenan Yang (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: