Purpose. Research and identify features of the use of artificial intelligence technologies in the preparation and implementation of individual acts of public authorities and their officials; and also identify the risks that arise when using artificial intelligence technologies in the process of adoption and implementation of individual legal acts. Methodology: the article uses methods of comprehensive research and system analysis, synthesis, formal legal. Conclusions. The study allowed us to conclude that AI is currently used, in particular, when informing participants in legal relations about the activities of public authorities and their officials, the procedure for their adoption of individual legal acts and their implementation, the procedure for contacting these bodies and officials, the procedure for appealing decisions and actions; when citizens and legal entities apply to public authorities and their officials; in the process of adoption of individual legal acts; in the process of implementing individual legal acts and monitoring their implementation. Scientific and practical significance. This study allows us to draw scientific attention to the issues of using AI in the process of preparing and implementing individual acts. The conclusions formed in the article can serve as the basis for further scientific discussion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yulia M. Smolina (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: