In the paper Shariff ( Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 76:143–161, 2023) a functional basis of a system of vectors and symmetric tensors is proposed. The functional basis is expressed in terms of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the first tensor and includes a smaller number of terms in comparison to the classical irreducible representation (see, e.g., Boehler, J. Appl. Math. Mech. 57:323–327, 1977; Pennisi and Trovato, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 25:1059–1065, 1987). In the present contribution, we show that elements of the functional basis by Shariff ( Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 76:143–161, 2023) do not represent isotropic invariants of the vector and tensor arguments and cannot thus be referred to as the functional basis. To this end, a counterexample with two symmetric tensors is considered. Under an arbitrary orthogonal transformation the functional basis (Shariff, Q. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 76:143–161, 2023) of these two tensors should remain constant but it does change in contrast to the classical representation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikhail Itskov (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: