Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To train a machine to “sense” a users’ feelings through writings (sentiment analysis) has become a crucial process in several domains: marketing, research, surveys and more. Nevertheless in times of crisis like COVID. Typo is one of the underestimated challenges processing user-generated text (comments, tweets, ..etc), it affects both learning and evaluation processes. Word tokenization outcome changes drastically even with a single character change, hence as expected, experiments have shown significant accuracy decreases due to typo. Adding a spelling correction as preprocessing layer, building one for every language, is a very time and resources expensive solution, a huge challenge against large data and real-time processing. Alternatively, a CNN model consuming the same text, once tokenized on characters level and once on words level while inducing typo, showed that as the typo percentage approaches 10% of the text, the results with characters tokens surpasses words tokens. Finally, on %30 typo of the text, the model consuming characters tokenization outperformed itself with the word level by a significant %22.3 in accuracy and %24.9 in F1-Score, using the same exact model. This approach in solving the inevitable typo challenge in NLP proved to be of significant practicality, saving huge resources versus using a spelling-correction model beforehand. It also removes a blocker challenge in front of real-time processing of user-generated text while preserving acceptable accuracy results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shawky et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: