Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study was a follow-up to the "rehabilitation exercise and physical education" operation plan research.To establish a Living Lab model, this study analyzed each case (Living Lab participants' satisfaction, experts' points of improvement, cautionary points, and points needed for continuation).The Living Lab operation case of the "Rehabilitation Exercise and Physical Education" Living Lab model (4P-REPELLM), which is based on the public-private-citizen partnership, was applied.The results of the study are as follows: First, the Living Lab main agent needs to be changed to a user-driven type in the future with the operator and the participant becoming a co-agent.Second, it is necessary for research institutes composed of professionals to cooperate as intermediaries in each area (companies, users, and public) to operate the Living Lab.Third, by 4P, it was presented operational guidelines for demonstration-user opinion collection-service calculation and practicalization.Fourth, they were satisfied with 3.69-4.31(points) based on the 5-point Likert scale, which was followed by psychological factors (4.10±0.12),reliability factors (4.01±0.16),and convenience (3.92±0.22).As a result of the interview, the reasons for the recommendation were satisfaction with real-time monitoring, expertise, and customized programs, and the most satisfactory points were voluntary time to participate in exercise, exercise intensity control, expertise and the like.Fifth, as a result of investigating development plans through analysis of experts' interview, based on the 4P-REPELLM operation guidelines, easy accessibility, reliable exercise equipment upgrade and inspection, data construction, professional operation experts, and budget planning are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cho et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: