The effect of rest redistribution on kinetic and kinematic variables during the hang pull

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of rest redistribution (RR) on kinetics and kinematics during the hang pull (HP). Twenty-one male athletes (age 29.5 ± 4.3 years, height 1.78 ± 0.07 m, body mass 75.17 ± 11.11 kg, relative one repetition maximum [1RM] power clean [PC] 1.17 ± 0.14 kg.kg -1 ) performed the HP using 140% of 1RM PC with 3 traditional sets of 6 repetitions (TS), 9 sets of 2 repetitions with RR [45s rest after 2 repetitions] (RR 45 ) and 6 sets of 3 repetitions with RR [72s rest after 3 repetitions] (RR 72 ). Peak velocity (PV) was higher during RR 72 (1.18 ± 0.11 m.s -1 ) compared to RR 45 (1.14 ± 0.11 m.s -1 ) for the average of 18 repetitions ( p = 0.025, g = 0.36). There was a main effect for set configuration with greater peak force (PF) ( p < 0.001, g = 0.14) during RR 72 compared to RR 45, with greater PV and impulse ( p < 0.001, g = 0.19–0.36) during RR 72 compared to RR 45 . There was also greater peak velocity maintenance (PVM) ( p = 0.042, g = 0.44) for RR 72 compared to RR 45. There were no significant or meaningful differences ( p > 0.05, g = 0.00–0.59) between configurations for any other variables. Rest redistribution protocols did not result in significantly or meaningfully greater kinetics or kinematics during the HP when compared to a TS protocol; although performing RR 72 resulted in higher PF, PV, and impulse, with improved PVM compared to RR 45.