Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To estimate the depth errors in a subsurface model obtained from the inversion of seismic data, the stationary‐phase approximation in a two‐dimensional constant‐velocity model with a dipped reflector is applied to migration with a time‐shift extension. This produces two asymptotic solutions: one is a straight line, and the other is a curve. If the velocity differs from the true one, a closed‐form expression of the depth error follows from the depth and apparent dip of the reflector as well as the position of the amplitude peak at a non‐zero time shift, where the two solutions meet and the extended migration image focuses. The results are compared to finite‐frequency results from a finite‐difference code. A two‐dimensional synthetic example with a salt diapir illustrates how depth errors can be estimated in an inhomogeneous model after inverting the seismic data for the velocity model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
W. A. Mulder (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: