Sulfide-based pathways for generating nitrite to sustain anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) have garnered increasing attention. However, the presence of sulfide can also impact the anammox process, necessitating a comprehensive understanding of both its short-term and long-term effects on anammox. This study aimed to investigate the influence of sulfide on anammox, including its effects on the microbial community and process kinetics. During long-term operation, the maximum sulfide dosage tested was 30 mg S/L over 50 days of operation, exhibiting good nitrogen removal efficiency of 83.9%±4.8%. Conversely, under short-term exposure to sulfide, nitrogen removal efficiency was notably affected, decreasing to 68.98% at a considerably lower sulfide concentration of only 16 mg S/L. Within the context of long-term sulfide exposure, the maximum contribution of anammox to nitrogen removal reached 86.72% at a sulfide dosage of 25 mg S/L. However, when the influent sulfide concentration was increased to 50 mg/L, the contribution of anammox to nitrogen removal sharply declined to 41.3%. Microbial community analysis revealed as the sulfide concentration increased from 8 to 16 mg S/L, the abundance of anammox bacteria decreased from 2.46×105 to 1.67×105 copies/mL, whereas the abundance of Nitrobacter spp. increased from 2.73×102 to 8.13×102 copies/mL. However, during long-term operation, there was a more pronounced decrease in the microbial abundance of anammox, reducing from 5.3×105 to 3.77×102 copies/mL. Taking this decrease together with the improved efficiency of anammox observed during long-term operation, these findings suggest that sulfide's influence on anammox primarily impacts its metabolic activity rather than its microbial abundance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Owaes et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: