Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In trust relationships, one person has a 'beneficial interest' in another's performance. The former not only would but should benefit from the latter's action, and the latter has a 'fiduciary duty' toward the former to so act. But where that act would otherwise be wrong, the first person's beneficial interest would be providing a pro tanto reason for the second person to do something that is pro tanto wrong. That reason can – and should – be removed by the former renouncing their beneficial interest in the latter's pro tanto wrongful action. Doing so would cancel the fiduciary's excuse for wrongdoing on the beneficiary's behalf.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert E. Goodin (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: