GaN-based semiconductor technology is the enabler for both high power density and high efficiency power electronics systems. In these systems power devices are usually required to operate at high switching frequencies (i.e. several hundreds of kilohertz), therefore topologies enabling soft-switching of the employed power semiconductors are selected, e.g. resonant converters. When operating GaN-on-Si HEMTs at high frequency, however, in the soft-switching regime the so called dynamic C <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">OSS</inf> losses within the semiconductor die may become a critical limiting factor to the overall converter efficiency. In this paper we propose a novel method to experimentally quantify this loss mechanism by means of a novel, simple and fast calorimetric characterization approach. That method is based on selecting the measurement time instants such that the thermal time constants associated to the semiconductor packages can be neglected, which allows to accelerate and simplify both the calibration and the measurement procedures. By means of the proposed method C <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">OSS</inf> losses of commercially available 600 V GaN HEMTs featuring two different R <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS,on</inf> have been experimentally measured at various switching frequencies and several switching speeds (dv <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">DS</inf> /dt). Finally, obtained measurement results are presented, compared and discussed by highlighting the main dependencies of the experimental C <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">OSS</inf> losses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Filippis et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: