Purpose: To investigate the IVF/ICSI outcomes and influencing factors of low basal AMH level young patients with elevated and decreased basal FSH levels. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 70,644 IVF/ICSI cycles performed at a tertiary hospital reproductive center between January 2017 and December 2022. After 1:2 propensity score matching for age and AMH of low basal AMH level patients (AMH < 1.1ng/mL) aged 20-39 years, 298 low basal FSH level cycles (FSH < 5mIU/ml) and 149 high basal FSH level cycles (FSH > 25mIU/ml) were included. Results: The clinical pregnancy rates (35.07% vs. 23.81%, P = 0.007), live birth rates (28.36% vs. 16.67%, P = 0.007), cumulative clinical pregnancy rates (19.80% vs. 8.05%, P = 0.001), and cumulative live birth rates (16.78% vs. 6.04%, P = 0.002) were all higher in the low FSH level group. After adjusting for BMI and ovulation induction protocol, a high basal FSH level was negatively associated with the number of good-quality embryos ( P = 0.007), cumulative clinical pregnancy (OR 0.430 (0.216, 0.854), P = 0.016) and cumulative live birth (OR 0.396 (0.183, 0.855), P = 0.018). AFC was positively correlated with clinical pregnancy (OR 1.151 (1.050, 1.262), P = 0.003), live birth (OR 1.121 (1.013, 1.241), P = 0.027), cumulative clinical pregnancy (OR 0.430 (0.216, 0.854), P = 0.016) and cumulative live birth (OR 0.396 (0.183, 0.855), P = 0.018). Conclusion: Low basal AMH level young patients with low basal FSH level had more AFCs and showed better pregnancy outcomes. A high basal FSH level was negatively associated with the number of good-quality embryos, cumulative clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. AFC was positively correlated with pregnancy outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yilei et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: