⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

February 23, 2024Deleted Journal

Amplatzer or Figulla Flex II Occluder: A Comparative Study of Outcomes After Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure

Stefan Toggweiler Federico Moccetti Nina Conrad Lucca Loretz Mehdi Madanchi Matthias Bossard Adrian Attiger-Toller Florim Cuculi Mathias Wolfrum

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

The present report compares results of 2 widely used, self-expanding, double-disc occluders: the Abbott Amplatzer PFO occluder and the Occlutech Figulla Flex II PFO occluder. Original Contribution from Journal of Invasive Cardiology. patent foramen ovale closure Amplatzer occluder device percutaneous closure Outcomes

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Toggweiler et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e77e09b6db6435876f21be https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/23.00291

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1AMPLATZER versus Figulla occluder for transcatheter patent foramen ovale closurecohort · 2017 · 21 citations
2Figulla PFO occluder versus Amplatzer PFO occluder for percutaneous closure of patent foramen ovalecase-control · 2010 · 20 citations
3Safety and efficacy of Cardi-O-fix occluder for percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovalecohort · 2017 · 8 citations
4The RISE Study: Retrospective Registry for the International Safety and Efficacy Results of Patent Foramen Ovale Closure with Figulla Flex Il PFO and UNI Occluders2024 · 1 citations
5Percutaneous Atrial Shunt Closure Using the Novel Occlutech Figulla Device: 6‐Month Efficacy and Safetycohort · 2010 · 26 citations