This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Introduction The visual system is a prominent site of damage in MS since the earliest phases of the disease. Altered low-contrast visual acuity (LCVA) test has been associated with visual impairment and retinal degeneration, predicting medium- and long-term disability. However, it is unclear whether LCVA may also represent a reliable measure of neuroinflammation and a predictor of disease evolution in the very early stages of MS. Methods We explored in a group of 76 consecutive newly diagnosed relapsing–remitting MS (RR-MS) patients without visual impairment or altered visual evoked potentials, the association between LCVA scores at 2.5% and 1.25% and clinical characteristics, including prospective disability evaluated after 1- and 2 years of follow-up. Associations between LCVA and the CSF levels of IL-10 at diagnosis were also analyzed. Results A negative correlation was found between LCVA at 2.5% and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) evaluated at first (Spearman’s Rho = −0.349, p = 0.005, n = 62) and second year (Spearman’s Rho = −0.418, p < 0.001, n = 62) of follow-up, and negative correlations were found with Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS) at first (Spearman’s Rho = −0.359, p = 0.004, n = 62) and second year (Spearman’s Rho = −0.472, p < 0.001, n = 62). All the data were confirmed by a mixed effect model, considering other clinical variables. A positive correlation was found between the CSF concentrations of IL-10 and LCVA at 2.5% (Spearman’s Rho = 0.272, p = 0.020, n = 76), and 1.25% (Spearman’s Rho, = 0.276, p = 0.018, n = 76), also evidenced in a linear regression. Discussion In MS patients at diagnosis, altered LCVA may be associated with CSF inflammation and represent a useful parameter to identify patients with worse disease course.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dolcetti et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: