Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite evidence regarding the benefits of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury, few trials have examined the treatment safety. Therefore, we created a phase I trial in Japan to investigate the safety of tDCS after severe brain injury. We verified the safety of tDCS through constant left frontal anodal stimulation at 2 mA for 20 minutes for 5 consecutive days. Additionally, we added a variable stimuli period to explore the effects of stimulus intensity, location, and duration. We adapted a traditional 3 + 3 study design. We assessed the rate of adverse effects, including skin burns and clinical seizure. Changes in neurological symptoms were evaluated using the Glasgow Coma Scale, Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, and 4 states of consciousness (coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, minimally conscious state, and severe disability). Six patients completed the study. No obvious adverse events were observed during the constant stimulation period or the variable stimulation period (right frontal anodal stimulation, stimulation frequency 2–4 mA, 1 or 5 times per week for a period of 4 weeks). Regarding the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised, patients in 4 out of 6 instances (66.7%) improved by more than 1 point. Our phase I safety study indicated that a single course of tDCS was safe in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. The next step is a phase II trial to investigate the preliminary efficacy and safety of tDCS at 2 mA (in comparison with sham stimulation).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yamaki et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: