PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 20, 2024Journal of Physics D Applied Physics12 citationsOpen Access

Characterization of a hyperbolic vortex plasma reactor for the removal of aqueous phase micropollutants

View Full Paper
RKRoman KlymenkoEKEsther de KroonLALuewton L. F. Agostinho

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract The present study focuses on the characterization of a hyperbolic vortex plasma reactor through the comparison of various plasma-atmospheric regimes for the production efficiency of reactive nitrogen (RNS) and reactive oxygen (ROS) species. The research also explores effectiveness in the removal of micropollutants, including pharmaceuticals and per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). The technology includes several degradation mechanisms, such as advanced oxidation, ultraviolet photolysis, ozonation, electrolysis, and shockwave water purification, without the need for additional chemicals. Our results indicate that the plasma of bipolar or ‘flashover’ mode is notably more effective and efficient than both positive or negative polarity. Through the testing of various energy levels, it has been demonstrated that higher energy plasma yields lower efficiency but necessitates shorter treatment times compared to lower energy treatment. When plasma is produced under ambient atmosphere, water chemical properties change significantly in comparison to treatment under argon (Ar) or nitrogen (N 2 ) due to the presence of both oxygen and N 2 molecules. In a N 2 atmosphere, the predominant formation is of RNS due to the chemical reactivity of N 2 exited states, whereas under Ar atmosphere, predominantly ROS are generated. Notable advantages of this technology are its scalability and its low energy requirements. The scalability of the technology involves increasing the size of the reactor, the power and electrode count.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Klymenko et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e785c1b6db6435876f8968https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ad2b22
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Implementation of a Hyperbolic Vortex Plasma Reactor for the Removal of Micropollutants in Water2025
  2. 2A Novel Plasma Based Technology for Efficient Produced Water Treatment, Recycle, and Reuse2025
  3. 3Plasma-Based Technology Enables Efficient Produced-Water Treatment, Recycling, and Reuse2025
  4. 4Selective reactive oxygen and nitrogen species production in plasma-activated water via dielectric barrier discharge reactor: An innovative method for tuning and its impact on dye degradation2024 · 64 citations
  5. 5Plasma-Activated Homogeneous Catalysis for Water Decontamination: Mechanisms, Synergies, and Future Perspectives2025 · 1 citations