This work-in-progress paper reports preliminary results about engineering students' perceptions of the justice and fairness in grading. The paper quantitatively compares students' perceptions between a specifications graded and traditionally graded capstone class and analyzes qualitative comments about students' overall perceptions of grading. Specifications grading is a system of assigning grades primarily characterized by grading each assignment as pass or no-pass (i.e., fail) and is proposed as a way to increase students' learning, motivation, and autonomy while also modeling real (engineering) workplace practices. The results of this work in progress suggest a number of interesting findings primarily the difference between the quantitative and qualitative findings. The quantitative results suggest a positive perception of specification grading while the qualitative results suggest a more negative outlook. Future work is needed to better understand this difference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Martin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: