Background and Objectives The effect of elevated atmospheric CO 2 (eCO 2 ) on rice ( Oryza sativa L.) grain quality has been widely studied, but mostly under two contrasting levels of CO 2 concentration. Our study was conducted in a new version of CO 2 Gradient Tunnel (CGT) to study the responses of grain quality of japonica rice cv. Wuyoudao no.4 (WYD4) and Songjing no.9 (SJ9) to five CO 2 concentrations (390–600 μmol·mol −1 ) gradient levels at two cultivation practices: traditional flooding (TF) and non‐flooded plastic film mulching (PM). Findings The results showed that the response of SJ9 to eCO 2 was more pronounced under TF cultivation. When the CO 2 concentration increased to 450 μmol·mol −1 , the brown rice ratio and milled rice ratio of SJ9 decreased by 4.2% and 17.7%, respectively. However, when CO 2 concentration increased to 600 μmol·mol −1 , the brown rice ratio increased by 3.7%. These results reveal that different gradients of eCO 2 have different effects on rice quality. Besides that, eCO 2 decreased the nutritional quality of SJ9 by decreasing the protein content and amylose content, while eCO 2 improved rice appearance and eating quality. Different from SJ9, when CO 2 concentration increased to 500–600 μmol·mol –1 , the milled rice ratio and head rice ratio of WYD4 increased by 5.9%–7.5% and 16.7%–19.5% under PM cultivation. Furthermore, eCO 2 decreased the chalky grain rate or chalkiness by 34.5%–80.5% and 53.1%–77.1%, respectively. Conclusions Under PM cultivation, the rice milling quality and appearance quality of WYD4 were promoted by eCO 2 . Rice nutritional quality was significantly decreased in both cultivation practices. In the comparison of rice quality between the two cultivations, except for rice eating quality, the other grain quality parameters of SJ9 under PM cultivation were better than those under TF cultivation. The opposite was true for WYD4. Significance and Novelty Under future production conditions with eCO 2 , the high‐yielding SJ9 cultivar is more suitable for water‐saving cultivation with mulching film, while the high‐quality WYD4 is suitable for TF cultivation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: