Computational thinking refers to a set of skills necessary to conceptualize data and solve problems with a computer. While rooted in computer science, the skills are general enough to be useful to all professionals in design and problem-solving fields, including engineering. The Next Generation Science Standards (Achieve, 2013) promote developing computational thinking in K-12 students by integrating the skills into the context of other science instruction. However, there are barriers to implementation, including that current K-12 science teachers have not been trained in computational thinking and few tools exist to support teachers who want to integrate computational thinking into classroom learning. The NSF-funded 3D Weather Analysis and Visualization (3D Weather) project is creating a contextual framework to support the integration of computational thinking into 7th-12th grade science classes. The 3D Weather project is supporting teachers who are teaching basic meteorology concepts in order to engage their students in the analysis of real weather data visualized in three dimensions. The focus of the project is on providing the professional development that science teachers need in order to write lessons that motivate student learning of and practice with computational thinking. Current 3D Weather professional development includes guidance for computational thinking principles, instruction for downloading and analyzing real weather data, training for visualizing weather data in 3D using existing tools, and support for how to integrate computational thinking into K-12 classrooms. Meteorology was chosen as the context for the computational thinking instruction because it is a science phenomenon that is universally familiar to all: everyone has some experience with weather. The computational thinking skills taught through the 3D Weather project include understanding and manipulating complex three-dimensional data through visualization, and the relationship between input variables and outcomes. The inaugural year of the grant was in 2020, but due to COVID-19 restrictions, planned activities were modified and scaled back. Originally scheduled as a one-week online followed by one-week face-to-face training, the project delivered an entirely online pilot version of the two-week professional development in July 2020. Participants included four middle school science teachers. The training consisted of two content modules that covered how weather is affected by 1) temperature and 2) pressure and wind. The professional development included additional modules detailing how to install, navigate, and use Integrated Data Viewer (IDV), a free 3D visualization tool which was designed to be used with geoscience data (Unidata Program Center/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research, 2020). Videos lectures on weather and IDV were made available to the teachers in the form of voice-over PowerPoint slides. In addition, multiple group video conference calls were scheduled with the teachers so that they could ask questions of and provide feedback to the project staff. Survey and interview data were collected from the teachers and will be used to improve future offerings of the training. In this Work-in-Progress paper, we briefly discuss the motivation for the 3D Weather Analysis and Visualization project, the design of the initial professional development activities, and the top "lessons learned" from our first professional development offering. This paper will be of interest to computing professionals who want to help teachers incorporate computational thinking into K-12 classrooms and to those offering professional development that requires teachers to learn a new computing tool. References Achieve. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards. Achieve, Inc. https://www.nextgenscience.org Unidata Program Center/University Corporation for Atmospheric Research. (2020). Unidata's Integrated Data Viewer. https://www.unidata.ucar.edu/software/idv/docs/userguide/index.html
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ko et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: