The generalized version of the stochastic canonical equations <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>K</m:mi> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>K</m:mi> <m:mn>7</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>K</m:mi> <m:mn>16</m:mn> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:math> {K₁,K₇,K₁₆} and <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>K</m:mi> <m:mn>27</m:mn> </m:msub> </m:math> {K₂₇} are founded under the generalized Lindeberg condition with the help of which the main MAGIC estimators <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mn>55</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mn>56</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mn>57</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mn>58</m:mn> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:math> {G₅₅,G₅₆,G₅₇,G₅₈} are found.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vyacheslav L. Girko (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: