Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We provide evidence that the approach of [Ilyashenko 1991] to the proof of Dulac's theorem has a gap. Although the asymptotics of [Ilyashenko 1991] capture far more than the asymptotics of Dulac, we prove that the arguments for why the asymptotics in [Ilyashenko 1991] are not themselves oscillatory is insufficient. We give an explicit counterexample and we draw confines to which Ilyashenko's result may be restricted in order to keep the validity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melvin Yeung (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: